Home / Articles / Views / In Case You Missed It /  In case you missed it | Is it pay phones or their users we dislike the most?
. . . . . . .
Give Through iGivefirst
Thursday, April 11,2013

In case you missed it | Is it pay phones or their users we dislike the most?

By Boulder Weekly Staff

Well, it’s official. The city of Boulder is getting rid of the last few pay phones that still dot the Pearl Street Mall. Most of the city’s motive is pretty simple: The phones just aren’t used that much anymore because “everyone” has a cell phone. And then, of course, there is the city’s never-ending quest for cosmetic perfection, as highlighted by Director of Downtown and University Hill Management Molly Winter’s recent quote concerning the phones in the Daily Camera, “They’re not necessarily attractive in their current form. They don’t add to the mall’s ambiance.”

We admit it, pay phones are rarely used, they are germ factories and they are not particularly attractive. But…

Once again, Boulder’s administrators have been blinded by long-term exposure to life within the open-space moat. This just in: Not everyone can afford a cell phone with its monthly payments, and some people just hate the damn things too much to own one.

Anyone who has paid attention to the mall’s pay phones in recent years knows exactly who is dependent on them. It is primarily the homeless and transient populations.

Considering other recent actions taken by the city — actions designed to get rid of our homeless population by making it more difficult for them to get by around here — perhaps those who still use the pay phones are considered to be just as out of step with the mall’s ambiance as the pay phones themselves.

Here’s a solution for city leaders that would put poor humans and those addicted to cosmetic beauty on equal footing: Leave just one measly, unattractive pay phone on the mall for those who actually need it, namely, people too poor or too wise to own cell phones. Just one. Is that really too much to ask? We’ll see.


We were happy to see that a couple of researchers featured in Boulder Weekly’s “fracademic freedom” series last year will be the guest speakers at a local event about hydraulic fracturing this month.

Geoffrey Thyne, who was profiled by BW on Aug. 16, claims that after he left the Colorado School of Mines due to pressure from the oil and gas industry, he lost his university job in Wyoming after an industry association complained to his superiors about comments he made about fracking.

Thyne will be one of the headliners at “Be Frack Sure” on April 27, a day-long event featuring speeches, panel discussions and music by the Hazel Miller Band.

Joining Thyne as the other featured guest speaker will be Anthony Ingraffea, an engineering professor at Cornell University whose work was discussed in an Aug. 30 BW article. Ingraffea and Cornell colleagues Robert Howarth and Renee Santoro published a paper in 2011 showing that methane emissions from the extraction of shale gas were higher than they were from coal, and the findings were attacked by the gas industry.

Other panelists include some of the state’s foremost experts on fracking and its impacts, including Sam Schabacker of Food and Water Watch, Phil Doe of Be the Change, retired EPA staffer Wes Wilson, Shane Davis of the Poudre Canyon Group of the Sierra Club, Jeanne Basset of Environment Colorado and Pete Morton of The Wilderness Society. They will discuss community organizing as well as the health and economic ramifications of the fracking boom.

The event, sponsored by Patagonia and organized by Our Longmont, is being held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the Best Western Plus Plaza Hotel and Conference Center in Longmont. Tickets cost $38, and the price includes lunch as well as snacks. Tickets must be purchased in advance. For more information, see www.fracksure.org.

Sounds like a frackin’ good time. Maybe somebody should invite Hick. Respond: letters@boulderweekly.com

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No Registration Required

It was just a matter of time to have them removed.


The city administrators should have come up with an alternative so the people who don't own a mobile phone could always make a call when needed. There are many low cost telecom solutions out there that a look on http://www.accuvoipservices.com/services/ would have been enough to solve the issue.


The city authorities are doing the right thing here, the concept of pay phones has become so obsolete now because of the availability of cellphones. These days you can find the cellphone accessories online at http://www.libratel.com/Wall-Chargers.


Probably they are taking the right decision by removing the payphones. Now technology has advanced a lot and now people uses their phone not only for making calls but they also use these to do other works. But no one is ready yet to say goodbye to computers. However, if you have computer which is malfunctioning you should contact a good service provider like http://www.ComputerServices.com.