Find Local Events (pick a date)
 
Browse Boulder real estate by neighborhood, school and zip code along with other homes for sale in Colorado on COhomefinder.com
Browse Boulder real estate by neighborhood, school and zip code along with other homes for sale in Colorado on COhomefinder.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Boulderganic / Boulderganic /  Governor’s Water Plan could ignite water war
. . . . . . .
Give Through iGivefirst
Thursday, July 31,2014

Governor’s Water Plan could ignite water war

By Boulder Weekly Staff
Photo Public Domain

“This plan reads like a river-destroyer’s manifesto, not a science-based public policy document.” —Gary Wockner, director of Save the Poudre

In May of last year, Governor John Hickenlooper issued an executive order to create the Colorado Water Plan. As a part of the process established by the governor’s order, nine regional roundtables were empowered to create water plans for the river basins in their particular areas. These regional plans are referred to as Basin Implementation Plans or BIPs. The idea being that, in the end, the Colorado Water Conservation Board would take all nine BIPs and stitch them together into a single comprehensive state plan for how to use and manage our most precious resource, water.

The process has been controversial since the beginning. For the past four years, environmental groups, including Save the Poudre, have been calling attention to the makeup of the South Platte Roundtable and others. Save the Poudre claims that the governor’s entire water planning process has been hijacked, claiming in various press releases that “the very same actors that benefit from draining and destroying Colorado’s rivers were appointed to write the South Platte BIP” and that “the South Platte Roundtable, which wrote the BIP, is a corrupt process with no — zero — representation from environmental groups whose mission is to protect and restore rivers.”

While the first public release of the South Platte and Metro Denver Roundtables is scheduled for Thursday, July 31, Save the Poudre used the Colorado Open Records Act last week to secure an early draft copy of the plan dated June 18. It would be an understatement to say that the organization, which is dedicated to protecting the Poudre River and advocating for river protection elsewhere, did not like what it read.

“This is a river destruction plan, not a water plan,” said Gary Wockner, director of Save the Poudre in a press release. “Every conceivable bad idea is endorsed in this plan — it would kill our rivers and ignite a water war throughout the state.

“Governor Hickenlooper needs to know that his Colorado Water Plan process has been corrupted, and it has created a draft plan for the South Platte/Metro area that is completely distorted. Governor Hickenlooper must fix this problem.”

Save the Poudre claims that “in addition to supporting every conceivable bad river-destruction idea, the draft BIP also endorses ‘streamlining’ state of Colorado permitting and water court processes to fast-track dams and pipelines. It also relies on completely biased propaganda about the impact of water policies on farms. For example, the BIP regurgitates propaganda directly out of the debunked 2008 Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Northern Integrated Supply Project (NISP) suggesting that if NISP isn’t built, farms would be dried up. A later technical report from Save The Poudre indicated the exact opposite, that NISP would force the subdivision and pave-over of up to 100,000 acres of farms in northern Colorado and the West Slope.”

“Much of the South Platte/Metro BIP is offensive anti-science and antienvironmentalism,” says Wockner. “This plan reads like a river-destroyer’s manifesto, not a science-based public policy document.”

As if to confirm Wockner’s claims, the June 18-dated version of the 275- page South Platte/Metro BIP actually says that dams and reservoirs improve river health and that returning rivers to a more natural state is undesirable.

The public comment period for Basin Implementation Plans begins on July 31.

Respond: letters@boulderweekly.com

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
POST A COMMENT
No Registration Required
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

I visited Denver in the early 1970s, during a drought and with temperatures hovering around 100 degrees.  Being from "back East", I couldn't figure out why sprinklers were shooting water in grassy areas along the highways at 3:00 in the afternoon.  The roads were wet, and wasted water flowed down the curbs.  

 

I've since come to understand that water waste is how cities like Denver justify those big, expensive "reclamation" projects that make some of their citizens rich. These projects never go away--they return, year after year, like some opportunistic disease waiting to take advantage of its victim.

 

 Until Denver and Colorado Springs directly involve all of us in in the Colorado River watershed in a regional, long term water-use plan, we might as well be living in Las Vegas.  Unless Gov. Hickenlooper and our other elected representatives start thinking globally and for the long haul, it isn't likely that squabbling over water is going to help anybody but the dam builders.

 

 
Close
Close