Boulder Weekly on Facebook Boulder Weekly on Twitter Boulder Weekly on Tumblr Boulder Weekly's RSS feed Email Contact

Find Local Events (pick a date)
 
Browse Boulder real estate by neighborhood, school and zip code along with other homes for sale in Colorado on COhomefinder.com
Browse Boulder real estate by neighborhood, school and zip code along with other homes for sale in Colorado on COhomefinder.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Special Sections / Vote 2010 /  Polis is slam dunk for U.S. House
. . . . . . .
Give Through iGivefirst
Thursday, October 7,2010

Polis is slam dunk for U.S. House

By Boulder Weekly Staff

THIS RACE FEATURES Democratic incumbent Rep. Jared Polis, Republican Stephen Bailey, Libertarian Curtis Harris, Jenna Goss of the American Constitution Party and write-in Henry Raibourn.

U.S. representatives serve two-year terms, and the 2nd District stretches roughly from Boulder County to Eagle County. It would be an upset of unbelievable magnitude for Polis to lose this race, due to the large Democrat edge in voter registration.

Polis has two years under his belt as a congressman and a term as a member of the state Board of Education. He’s got no problems with name recognition or money, having earned a fortune in the private sector, and he’s used a lot of that money for philanthropy and progressive candidates and issues. He’s started his own schools. He’s been active on education issues in Congress and serves on the House Education and Labor Committee, the House Rules Committee and the House Judiciary Committee.

Polis’ probable closest opponent, Republican Stephen Bailey, put honor on his resume by serving in the U.S. Air Force and succeeded in the software industry, but he hasn’t held elected office, and he probably won’t win support from most residents of Boulder County with his positions.

Bailey claimed on his website that the federal health care act will reduce life expectancy and reduce quality of life. He wrote that climate change has been within historical norms, and that tactics against climate change are being pushed to curtail liberty. He won’t take earmarks and would repeal the estate tax. He discussed the national debt without mentioning that it tripled under Reagan and doubled under Bush the Second — and somehow, he still supports low taxes and cutting the debt at the same time.

Bailey is trying to appeal to Tea Party anger, but that won’t win him a race in the 2nd District. Harris and Goss might earn single-digit percentages at best, and if they do, their votes will probably just hurt Bailey. Vote for Polis.

Respond: letters@boulderweekly.com


  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
POST A COMMENT
No Registration Required
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

For the record, I have stated that Bush's economic policies were bad for America.  He oversaw, at the time, record budget deficits under both GOP and Democrat majority Congresses.  He grew the size of government with nearly 17,000 pages of new regulations under his administration.  Bush was bad for the economy.  Obama & a Democrat Congress are horrendous because deficits have reached new records -- 3x higher than Bush's largest; government is growing larger, faster under Obama and Democrats; and taxes are increasing.  No country has every taxed and spent its way to prosperity.  That is why we need to cut spending, cut the size of government & regulations and as we bring the budget under control, we cut taxes to return money back to the people that earned it.  Of course, BW could have discovered this information by talking to me in person.

www.StephenBaileyForCongress.com

 

http://harrisagainstcongress.com/

 

BW obviously is not interested in saying anything positive about Bailey or negative about Polis. The sarcasm spewed when mentioning Bailey's accomplishments is nauseating. Just because Polis has money and a recognizable name doesn't mean he connects with the majority of his constituents. I'll wait and see what happens Nov 2.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Writers of this article make no attempt whatsoever to even appear to be unbiased.

 

 
Close
Close