Boulder Weekly on Facebook Boulder Weekly on Twitter Boulder Weekly on Tumblr Boulder Weekly's RSS feed Email Contact

Find Local Events (pick a date)
 
Browse Boulder real estate by neighborhood, school and zip code along with other homes for sale in Colorado on COhomefinder.com
Browse Boulder real estate by neighborhood, school and zip code along with other homes for sale in Colorado on COhomefinder.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / National Today /  Judge orders woman adopted as baby deported to Mexico
. . . . . . .
Give Through iGivefirst
Friday, December 10,2010

Judge orders woman adopted as baby deported to Mexico

By McClatchy-Tribune News Service

TACOMA, Wash. — A federal immigration judge has ordered a 38-year-old woman adopted by an American couple from Mexico when she was 5 months old to be deported back to her native country.

Tara Ammons Cohen, who has been in the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma since July 8, 2009, has been fighting to stay in America ever since. She fears being deported to Mexico — where she hasn't lived since she was an infant, doesn't speak the language and knows no one — would place her in danger.

"Basically, the judge found her not eligible for withholding of removal (deportation) and found it more likely than not she wouldn't be persecuted" in Mexico, her attorney, Manuel Rios of Seattle, said Thursday.

Immigration laws do not recognize adoption as a special circumstance in deportations.

Judge Tammy Fitting's ruling essentially denied every aspect of Cohen's appeal except to agree that a drug conviction that led to her deportation problem was not a serious crime requiring her automatic removal.

Cohen's predicament was the subject of a News Tribune story in March that detailed her odyssey from adoption as a baby in a Mexico orphanage to her troubles with the law in 2008 that led to her detention in Tacoma by immigration officials.

The ruling this week stunned Cohen and Rios. After an October hearing, both had hoped she might be home with her husband and two young children in Omak for the holidays.

"I'm devastated," Cohen said Thursday in a telephone interview from the detention center. "My husband (Jay) is appalled by the system and angry the system says his wife is not going to be in danger if she goes back to Mexico.

"I know nothing about Mexico."

Cohen said that despite the immigration laws, she feels she is as American as anyone else is this country because she was brought here by her American parents and raised as an American.

Her parents didn't get her naturalized nor did she when she had the chance. By the time she tried to get citizenship as the spouse of an American, she was already in trouble with the law.

Cohen was arrested in 2008 on theft and drug-trafficking charges. She pleaded guilty to stealing a purse containing two bottles of prescription pills and to the trafficking charge, though she never sold a pill.

She served three months of a one-year-and-a-day sentence in prison and federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents took her into custody when she got out.

Because she was not considered a citizen or a legal resident, her drug charge made her an automatic candidate to be deported.

Cohen said she knows her immigration troubles are mostly of her own making but doesn't feel it is fair for her or other child adoptees. "I can't go back to Mexico," she said.

She said she plans to appeal the deportation decision again to the federal Bureau of Immigration Appeals. An earlier first appeal led to a hearing before Fitting.

The Mexican Consulate in Seattle thought enough of Cohen's case to ask Rios to be her attorney. The small fee he received came from the Mexican government through a program for Mexican nationals in the United States who need legal help.

Fitting initially ordered Cohen deported in October 2009. She appealed and the immigration appeals panel sent the case back to Fittings to review the seriousness of the drug charge.

At a hearing in October 2010, Fitting agreed the drug charge did not appear to be a "particularly serious" charge that would require her automatic deportation.

That verbal ruling and what Cohen and Rios felt was Fittings general sympathetic comments about the case gave them hope.

To stop the removal, however, Rios also argued that his client needed asylum because she would face persecution in Mexico.

Rios contended Cohen's particular circumstances — white, a woman, poor — would make her like an immigrant and subject to abuse and violence. She also suffers from a bipolar disorder and has been diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder stemming from an assault when she was a teenager.

"Six out of 10 migrant women and girls experience sexual violence in Mexico and all such women face this serious risk of trafficking," Rios said in his legal brief. "... Kidnapping of migrants for ransom reached almost 10,000 in 2009. ...

"Additionally, there is documentary evidence that (Cohen) would be persecuted in Mexico on account of her mental illness."

Besides violence, Rios said Cohen's circumstances would make it impossible for her to make a living and support herself in what would be essentially a foreign country.

Cohen also told the judge her husband and children wouldn't be able to be with her in Mexico. They too fear a life there, she said.

In her lengthy ruling, Fitting examined each of Cohen's fears and ruled she had not established that it is "more likely than not that she would be persecuted because of her circumstances."

Fitting noted the Mexican government has criminal laws and rules about women's rights and pay in the workplace as well as medical treatment for its citizens.

Though Cohen hasn't been in Mexico since she was a baby, Fitting noted that there was no evidence showing Cohen was persecuted by the Mexican government in the past.

"Not every act of discrimination or harassment rises to the level of persecution," the judge said.

———

(c) 2010, The News Tribune (Tacoma, Wash.).

Visit The News Tribune online at http://www.thenewstribune.com/.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
POST A COMMENT
No Registration Required
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

I agree,look if we dont enforce the law then its worthless,they should have nationalized her period,so a theif and an illegal gets deported good,now if here husband and kids go with her,justice will be surved,Ankor babbies or not,take them with you is my sugjestion.If we would not give citizenship to everyone just because there parents made it across the border and into an american hospital,and gave birth at our expence,a lot of this would go away,id deport all that could not show a valid birth cirtificate,or green card.that simple its not our responsability to take all that want to come here.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

You're an idiot if you believe in anchor babies. US citizens cannot sponsor noncitizen parents for immigration until they reach age 21. Get a clue.

 

So in 21 years,please thats the plan there are 10s of thousands of illigals children born hear every year,so as time goes on every day there are more and more illegals sponsored into this country,from one illegal,sham citizen,just because they game the 14th amendment,that inturn means more automatic alien births and so the scam continues.When does it stop,when we actually fix that loophole thats enturprited in a way it was not intended for.Mexico knows it cant just come and take america,but in time underhanded tactics like hopping the fence,bankrupting states,and gamming our constitution just might work over time.its time to end this game now.I see war but getting you cockroches out is the best thing america can do for america,mabbie not mexico but its time for us to worry about our own.

 

 
Close
Close