Home / Articles / Views / Perspectives /  Stand up for democracy
. . . . . . .
Give Through iGivefirst
Thursday, September 29,2011

Stand up for democracy

Vote ‘yes’ on 2H

By Carolyn Bninski


I am responding to Paul Danish’s Aug. 11 article (“Banning corporate personhood would destroy U.S. economy”).

Danish claims that corporate personhood is one of the defining characteristics of the corporation. Not true.

Until the Supreme Court decision in 1886 in Santa Clara vs. Southern Pacific Railroad, corporations were not considered to be persons with constitutional rights. Instead they were regarded as artificial entities regulated and chartered by state legislatures for a specific purpose and limited time period. They could lose their status if they violated their charter or hurt the public interest. The people were in secure control of corporations.

The limitations on corporations were very intentional on the part of the founders of this country who had been exploited and oppressed by corporations chartered by the king of England. Because the Supreme Court granted constitutional rights to corporations in 1886 and has greatly expanded those rights since that time, corporations have become the dominant force in all areas of our society, including in our political and economic systems. In courts of law, they have been able to use their constitutional rights to trump community efforts to protect the public good and the environment.

Through the buying of public officials with campaign contributions, corporations have been able to control the major decisions that are made in our legislatures at the national and state levels. This has been disastrous for our country. Corporations have undermined our ability to address our massive health care and environmental crises, exported our jobs to low-wage countries with minimal environmental regulation, undermined living wages, safety standards and the right to organize labor unions, and pressured Congress to create a massive war economy. Danish also claims that abolishing corporate personhood will negatively affect limited liability and dampen investment. This is not true. Limited liability for corporations comes from state statutes, not the Constitution, and will not be affected by reversing corporate personhood.

Ironically, Danish claims that reining in the corporations and putting the people back in charge of our country would destroy the economy. Where has Danish been? It was the largest financial corporations in the United States — Citicorp, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo to name a few — that speculated recklessly, out of pure unadulterated greed, on bad investments and drove the U.S. economy and the world economy into the ground.

And then when some Congress people wanted to reform the financial system, the banks bought off important members of the committees that were supposed to carry out the reform. This led Sen. Dick Durban of Illinois to remark: “Frankly they [the banks] own the place.” The result was ineffectual reform, continued massive speculation by the banks and a toppling world economy that continues to spiral downward.

Corporations can serve a legitimate role in our society. They can make products and provide jobs. They can serve the public. But as long as they are given constitutional rights, their power will drown out the voices of the real living, breathing people. Since the primary purpose of a corporation is to make profits, which are calculated quarterly, they rarely have the broad or long-term perspective of real people about what is best for the country and our people.

In Germany, where corporations are not considered persons and don’t have constitutional rights, the economy is doing much better than in the United States. Because the people have power over corporations, Germany has been able to better protect its workers from the economic disaster that is facing Americans. If corporate constitutional rights in the U.S. were abolished, Congress and the American people, rather than huge corporations, would have the power to make many more decisions about our environment, climate change, health care, jobs, our economy and our fast-disappearing safety net.

The purpose of Ballot Issue 2H is to give the people of Boulder an opportunity to voice support for a reversal of the radical Supreme Court decisions that gave corporations constitutional rights. These decisions were profoundly anti-democratic and cause major harm to most Americans on a daily basis. We need to reverse this as soon as possible.

Please stand up for democracy and vote for Ballot Issue 2H in support of limiting constitutional rights to real people. For more information or to get involved, go to www.yeson2H.org.

Respond: letters@boulderweekly.com

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No Registration Required

In 2010, the successful candidataes for Congress in Colorado raised an average of $1,300,000. The winner of the senate race raised over $11,000,000. This does not count the huge amount raised and spent by "Swift Boat" campaigns. Need it be said that non-wealthy humans contributed only a small percentage of these totals?

Can we really pretend that the donors don't expect anything in return? Wouldn't you if you were a CEO of significant corporate donor?

The system is broken. It is not the fault of any individual congressperson, who must compete in this system. 

Yes on 2H is the beginning of a movement to allow the repairs to be made to our political system that are necessary to giving voice back to human concerns over big money concerns.



These folks have it right! Think ahead to how our future will look if billionaires, $$ special interest groups and mega corporations continue to dominate and $ influence our society. Enough is enough already. Corporate protections are placed incorrectly in the U.S. Constitution. They need to go back to Federal or State statutes and charters. Then, and only then do PEOPLE have the say, the vote, and the power. Who do you want in charge? The mega corporations and billionaires, or you and me? I know where my vote will go... Yes on 2H.


Excellent piece by Carolyn Bninski!


Part of a class I am taking involves this particular subject and I am researching for information to use in an upcoming report. Your post is really helpful; do you have any others on this topic? Lizz Byrnes


Your knowledge of this subject comes through clearly in this article. I love to read this kind of articles, I hope you will update it. Thank you for sharing it with me. online proxy


There are so many different aspects when it comes to this topic. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge on this particular aspect. buy followers on instagram


This is a terrific article, and I would like more information if you have any. I am fascinated with this topic and your post has been one of the best I have read. Airbrush Makeup Systems


I am currently working on an assignment and I have been exploring your blog for a few hours. Thank you for your post it proved helpful for me. mineral makeup nz



And we need not look further than Xcel's spending on 2B & 2C (whether you are for or against municipalization) to see what millions from corporate coffers can do to real people's voices.


I found this post to be very educational. Thank you for broadening my knowledge of this subject. No doubt its a great piece of writing as well. Thanks hide my ass


Many entrepreneurs are thinking about putting up their own restaurants. Restaurants are generally seen as good business ventures because people are always looking for food. Ristorante Monopoli



Your MTTC assessments system may be the merely test out that assures your assessment prerequisites pertaining to educator qualification inside Michigan now. At the moment, your <a href="http://theexamcollection.com/">Examcollection</a> test out contains essential educating skills along with procedures, subject area tests along with planet language checks.



buy youtube subscribers to increase traffic and it also helps to increase customer <a href="http://www.buyyoutubesubscriberss.com/">buy youtube subscribers</a>



 In  addition, one is capable of making a speech that will be loved by many; first it must have the three important parts. Let’s start first with the introduction. It will be more suitable if you will start your speech with a catchy quote that is suitable for the party. You could add some humor to it by adhering to a non-offensive joke. Therefore, you will keep your audience interested as you present your father of groom speech. Then, what you need to do next is welcome your wedding guest to your son’s wedding day and the family members of the new bride. You can choose to do this or not. On the major component of your speech, you can give the newly betrothed couple some tips  on how to have a blissful and longer marriage. It could be some stuff that you have experienced on your own or from other people you recognize who have a good marriage. You may also get some uplifting tales from the web or books. By searching the world wide web you can have some tips with regards to father of the groom weddin Speeches and Toasts. And for the last part of the speech, you can finish it by providing them your blessing and give a toast to them.