Boulder Weekly on Facebook Boulder Weekly on Twitter Boulder Weekly on Tumblr Boulder Weekly's RSS feed Email Contact

Find Local Events (pick a date)
 
Browse Boulder real estate by neighborhood, school and zip code along with other homes for sale in Colorado on COhomefinder.com
Browse Boulder real estate by neighborhood, school and zip code along with other homes for sale in Colorado on COhomefinder.com.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Views / Uncensored /  Kick the Xcel habit
. . . . . . .
Give Through iGivefirst
Thursday, October 27,2011

Kick the Xcel habit

By Pamela White

The trouble with finding new sources of renewable energy is that the people who currently profit off our energy use want to continue profiting forever and ever. Our need as a human family to find new ways of staying warm, cooking our meals and making things go vroom is immaterial to people who will cease to be rich the moment we stop buying fossil fuels.

Imagine a nation where places once known as “gas stations” stay in business only by selling junk food and coffee and offering access to restrooms. Imagine a country where power is supplied through a hodgepodge of wind, solar, biomass, and tidal sources, with each family, neighborhood and town supplying their own. Imagine having no gasoline costs, no electricity bill, no heating bill.

For someone concerned about pollution and global climate change, it sounds like the endgame they’re working toward. For the people in these industries, it just sounds like the end.

I’m not asking you to feel sorry for them — I certainly don’t. I bring it up because it explains why companies like Xcel try so damned hard to keep us dependent upon them.

Their vision of the future, shared by the petroleum industry and the coal industry, is one in which they have a product to sell us — energy — and we continue to buy.

There are other visions out there.

Some members of Boulder Smart Energy Coalition, in cahoots with Xcel, reportedly want to profit off the creation of solar gardens.

At this point in human history, we have a chance to rethink how we use energy and how we extract it. It was a conscious corporate effort that created our gasoline-dependent culture, with industry pushing government to scuttle vast plans for public transportation in favor of cars. But with peak oil likely upon us, if not already behind us, we must start making new plans to feed our need for energy. This gives us an opportunity to create our future as consciously as industry created our past.

Industry has been contemplating this problem for quite some time. Many years ago, I went on a behind-the-scenes tour of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden. What I expected was an establishment dedicated to pure research on renewable energy. What I found was an institution that was deeply involved in public-private partnerships where tax dollars were being used to help create renewable energy technology that private industry would perhaps one day sell back to the same taxpayers who helped pay for its development. Well, that’s fine, I suppose, though I’ve always thought a taxpayer investment ought to come with a hefty taxpayer discount on the other end. But what the visit to NREL really showed me was how desperate industry is to retain control over our access to and supply of energy.

Think of it this way: You’re a crack addict, and fossil fuels are the best rock around. The extraction, refinement and distribution industries associated with fossil-fuel-based energy are your dealer. The last thing in the world they want is for you to kick the habit.

But kick the habit we must. We will eventually run out of oil deposits and mountains to tear down for coal. The energy industry knows this. But it wants to control that transition so it still has a product that we must buy.

What would Boulder look like if voters opt to municipalize energy and worked to take the entire town off the grid by putting solar panels on every home and building that could benefit from them, by erecting solar parks across the city, by taking advantage of wind energy where possible and using waste from our public lands for biomass energy?

If we pass measures 2B and 2C, we might get an answer to my question. At the very least, we’ll be in a position to explore our options as a city — and to shape our own future.

If we don’t pass 2B and 2C, we’ll continue to buy whatever Xcel sells us.

Vote YES on 2B and 2C. And when you consider Xcel’s actions during this election, vote YES on 2H, too. Corporations shouldn’t be able to buy their way into our elections.

Respond: letters@boulderweekly.com

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
POST A COMMENT
No Registration Required
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

I wish Ms White would execute her experiment on a much smaller community as proof of concept before scaling it up to a city the size of Boulder. Converting Boulder from fossil fuel to green energy is, at this time, neither practical nor economical.

 

"What would Boulder look like if voters opt to municipalize energy and worked to take the entire town off the grid by putting solar panels on every home and building that could benefit from them, by erecting solar parks across the city, by taking advantage of wind energy where possible and using waste from our public lands for biomass energy?" Like North Korea.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

"What would Boulder look like if voters opt to municipalize energy and worked to take the entire town off the grid [...]"

Like a city with no grid. The rich could still watch TV during the daytime hours, though, through their very own solar panels.

Tough luck for the poor.

 

It's really exciting to see how Xcel has managed to mobilize so much ignorance. This is not about taking Boulder off the grid, nor even necessarily about not buying power from Xcel. This is about whether for the next twenty years Xcel can, if they like, completely ignore Boulder's concerns in building new power sources, as they did in building their Comanche coal plant, for which they got the PUC to authorize them to charge Colorado customers. Gas turbines are reasonable as a base power source, can be turned up and down with demand. Lower gas rates will make it cheaper, and it can be scaled down to allow alternate sources to be used. Xcel can pretend it's giving Boulder 90% renewable energy, but it has made a major, long-term commitment to coal with Comanche.

 

@andy goetz Andy - This article was indeed asking the question: "What would Boulder look like if voters opt to municipalize energy and worked to take the entire town OFF THE GRID by putting solar panels on every home and building that could benefit from them, by erecting solar parks across the city, by taking advantage of wind energy where possible and using waste from our public lands for biomass energy?" Without a proof-of-concept at such a large scale, taking Boulder off the grid at this time would be a disaster. To your concern, Boulder could ask Xcel to provide them with renewable only energy. I am absolutely sure Xcel could find a way comply. Unfortunately, when he citizens of Boulder found out how much each KWh would cost and after dealing with the brownouts/blackouts, they would probably reconsider. Just to ask, what's the issue with coal?

 

 
Close
Close