Vote YES for minimum wage increase

by Bob Norris

3
Wikimedia Commons

My personal view has been that, when we do not pay a living wage, children and families suffer from food insecurity, substandard housing and inability to participate in many things that others do. All of us pay in the end. Eventually, we pay a bigger price when lack of nutritious food leads to under performance at school. Continued low wages result in having the tax payer subsidizing the low-wage-paying employers because of the need for public benefits.

The minimum wage was created to keep people out of poverty but is not currently high enough to accomplish that. Currently the minimum wage will not keep a single person with no dependents out of poverty. With children to support it is an even worse situation. I find it unsettling that too many do not share my concern that supporting conditions that result in people living in poverty is not consistent with the views of any religion.

The current minimum wage of $8.31 results in an annual income of about $17,000. With the increasing rents and other costs, this is not enough to get by. This forces many parents to work two or more full time jobs to support their children. As a result, parents have less time to spend with their children and are tired when they do.

I find it disturbing that legislators that oppose increases in the minimum wage, even for cities that would like to increase the minimum wage within city limits, also oppose bills that would provide relief for workers that are not paid all of the wages they earned or in many cases not paid at all. (I am sometimes amused by those that preach local control until it is not consistent with their views.)

The most common argument against raising the minimum wage is a false argument. Research using scientific methods consistently shows that increasing the minimum wage as proposed does not have a negative impact on jobs even in the industries one might expect to see an effect.

These scientific studies that compared adjacent counties where one had a higher minimum wage than the other found no effect on the number of jobs.

About half of small businesses already pay at least $12/hour. I have noticed help wanted signs around Longmont that are offering starting wages in excess of the current minimum wage and some close to the minimum wage proposed for 2020. Qdoba restaurants in Greeley bumped starting wages to $11/hour and were so pleased with the results including employee retention that it has bumped wages in all its restaurants.

Retention avoids retraining and other costs as well as maintaining quality. Replacement of a low-wage employee costs about 16 percent of their annual salary.

Low and middle income workers tend to spend most of their money in the local community. A federal bank study found that for every dollar increase in pay, workers will over one year spend another $2,800 in the local economy.

Nearly 320,000 workers in Colorado would benefit from the proposed increase in the minimum wage. Approximately 86 percent are over the age of 20 and about one-third are over 40. Women represent about 48 percent of Colorado workers but about 55 percent of those who would benefit from an increase in the minimum wage. Approximately 134,000 children would benefit.

Studies have shown that in states with higher minimum wage, small businesses grow faster. A recent survey shows that the majority of small businesses support increased minimum wages.

At a time when many people earn more than $100,000 per year or more, we should be able to find a solution to poverty. Supporting conditions that facilitate or do not facilitate poverty says a lot about our values and who we are as a people.
Bob Norris is a social justice activist who has lived in Longmont since the year 2000.

This opinion column does not necessarily reflect the views of Boulder Weekly.

  • ernie_oertle

    Fedgov is not making headway reducing poverty despite spending TRILLIONS of dollars, according to a study by the libertarian CatoInstitute. Despite BHO’s unprecedented increase in federal anti-poverty spending, the national poverty rate has not declined, the study finds. It’s trillions of dollars that have been spent since the `War on Poverty’ was started by LBJ in the mid-sixties.
    And expressed as a percentage, the same number of people are in poverty today as then. So allowing liberals to shower people w/ never-ending money is not an effective method for fixing a problem. Do you think liberals actually want to fix poverty? Do they want an end to racism? Do they want to fix any of this? No! They want credit for trying. They want credit for great, big, heartfelt redistributionist intentions. But if the problem were ever solved, there would be nothing to blame Republicans for.
    They want the money to spend.
    They want the money to spend.
    They want the money to spend.
    They want the money to spend.
    And then they want the money to spend.
    But they don’t want to fix the problem.
    If any of these problems ever got fixed, it would be the end of ’em.
    Nothing to complain about & nothing to blame Repewbs for.

  • ernie_oertle

    — A economically-insane $15 national(or state) minimum-wage, pushed by ideologic economic-theory illiterate redistributionists. Oh!, that won’t drive the costs of everything else up.

  • Enough of this coercive economic madness will truly wreck not only the economy, but what depends utterly on it, our standard of living (including Theirs).