EPA proposes sulfur dioxide limits for first time since 1971

0

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency is
continuing its crackdown on coal pollution with a new plan to cut sulfur
dioxide — a move that would clean up the air for millions of Americans and
bring some relief to people who suffer from asthma and other respiratory
diseases.

The new rule, which was proposed this month, would be the
first time since 1971 that the EPA has tightened controls on sulfur dioxide to
protect the public health.

“This would be an important step to ensure the health
of the American public,” said Dr. Alan H. Lockwood, a professor of
neurology and nuclear medicine at the University of Buffalo. “Tens of
thousands of Americans die each year from inhaling pollutants from coal
burning.”

By targeting coal pollutants, the EPA is cleaning up the
fuel that generates half the electricity generated in the U.S. Earlier, after a
series of court orders, the EPA said it would require power plants to eliminate
mercury pollutants. Now, the public and industry officials will be able to
comment on the sulfur dioxide proposal. A public hearing is set for Atlanta in
January.

In making its case for tougher regulations, the EPA’s
science advisers said research over the past 35 years shows that current
regulations didn’t protect public health enough, and the estimated health
benefits would greatly outweigh new costs to industry.

Sulfur dioxide is emitted by coal-fired power plants and
industries. Fossil fuel combustion at power plants produces 66 percent of the
sulfur dioxide in the air, the EPA reported. Most of the rest is from burning
fossil fuels for industry, but smaller amounts of the pollutant also are
released from other industrial processes, such as extracting metal from ore,
and the use of high-sulfur fuels by locomotives, ships and non-road equipment.

Sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere converts into fine particle
pollution that penetrates the lungs and can cause or worsen lung diseases.
Exposure to the pollutant even for a short time can make it hard for people
with asthma to breathe when they’re active outdoors. The scientific reports
also show that children and adults over 65 and people with heart or lung
disease are at the greatest risk.

The old rules set limits for sulfur dioxide as averages
measured over 24-hour and one-year periods. The new, more protective rule would
require one-hour measurements. As a result, short-term spikes of the pollutant
above a new limit — between 50 and 100 parts per billion over one hour — no
longer would be acceptable.

The EPA also proposed more monitoring and better ways to
alert the public about short-term high levels of sulfur dioxide. The new rules
will become final by June 2.

The EPA estimated that if the rule were put in place with
the strongest limits the agency is recommending, the benefits in 2020 would
include 4,700 to 12,000 fewer premature deaths a year and 3.6 million fewer
cases of worsened asthma. It also calculated that the costs of $1.8 billion to
$6.8 billion would be greatly outweighed by the health benefits from such
things as fewer emergency room visits or lost days of work.

Lockwood of the University of Buffalo is the lead author of
a new report by Physicians for Social Responsibility that looks at the health
impacts of coal from mining and transportation to burning it and handling
post-combustion waste.

The report, released on Nov. 18, examines peer-reviewed
scientific reports on the harm from all forms of coal pollution to the lungs,
heart and nervous system. The report also listed dangers to human health from
climate change, including deaths in more frequent heat waves and the spread of
infectious diseases such as malaria and dengue fever.

{::PAGEBREAK::}

Physicians for Social Responsibility won the 1985 Nobel
Peace Prize for pressing for an end to the nuclear arms race. The advocacy
group now also urges governments to adopt policies to reverse global warming
and protect the environment from pollution.

The EPA’s new rule on sulfur dioxide will make a difference
especially for people who live near or downwind from the plants, said Janice
Nolen, an American Lung Association vice president.

With sulfur dioxide pollution, even healthy adults who work
or exercise outside may be at risk of harm, Nolen said.

John Kinsman, the senior director for environment at the
Edison Electric Institute, which represents investor-owned electric companies,
said in a statement that the means of controlling sulfur dioxide would be
worked out by 2014 on the basis of state plans.

“It’s far too early to know just what would be required
of utilities to help meet a new standard,” he said.

Electricity generation from fossil fuels, mainly coal,
increased 70 percent between 1980 and 2008, and utilities reduced sulfur
dioxide emissions by 56 percent in that period, Kinsman said.

That decline was based on the EPA’s first sulfur reduction
standards from 1971 and the acid rain reduction program of the 1990s. Utilities
accomplished it by placing scrubbers on some smokestacks and switching to
low-sulfur coal.

The advocacy group Clean Air Watch plans to press EPA to set
the standard at the low end of the range. “A standard at that level would
provide the best level of health protection,” said its president, Frank
O’Donnell.

The push by EPA to toughen air pollution controls on coal
plants stems from a court order that found that the agency had improperly
removed coal plants from air regulations, said Alice Bodley, general counsel
for the American Nurses Association, one of the groups that sued the agency in
the case that led to the court decision.

Via McClatchy-Tribune News Service.

Previous articleEthics panel accuses S.C. governor of 37 violations
Next articleHow suite this Office clone is