Judge in gay marriage case had no legal obligation to remove himself, judge rules

0

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge on Tuesday refused to
invalidate last year’s ruling against Proposition 8, deciding the gay
jurist who overturned the same-sex marriage ban had no obligation to
step aside because of a possible conflict of interest.

The decision by Chief Judge James Ware of the U.S.
District Court in San Francisco left the ruling by retired Judge Vaughn
R. Walker in place. Walker’s decision remains on hold pending a separate
appeal to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Walker, 67, an openly gay judge, told reporters after
he retired in February that he and his partner, a physician, have been
together for 10 years. ProtectMarriage, the proponent of Proposition 8,
said Walker should have disclosed that prior to trial, and it asked Ware
to throw out his ruling.

Proponents of Proposition 8 argued that Walker’s
committed relationship, which he may eventually want to formalize, gave
the impression that he was not impartial.

Walker, a Republican appointee, has never said
publicly whether he wished to marry his partner. But he told reporters
that he never considered his sexual orientation grounds for declining to
preside over the Proposition 8 challenge.

Tuesday’s ruling followed a three-hour hearing Monday
in San Francisco in which backers of Proposition 8 argued that Walker
had a personal stake in the outcome of the marriage debate while
opponents of the ban countered that the challenge was a veiled attack on
Walker’s sexual orientation.

No court has ever upheld the removal of a judge from a
civil rights case because of his or her race, religion or gender,
according to lawyers in the case.

———

(c) 2011, Los Angeles Times.

Visit the Los Angeles Times on the Internet at http://www.latimes.com/.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.