NYTimes.com to launch ‘metered’ pay model in 2011

0

CHICAGONew York Times Co.’s
move to introduce an online pay model seems like a reasonable measure
to cope with deteriorating advertising revenue, but it’s unlikely that
many newspapers across the country will be in a position to follow suit
right away, experts said Wednesday.

Pressured by steep print-ad losses as more consumers
get their news and information via the Internet, the company said
Wednesday that NYTimes.com, its flagship newspaper’s Web site, will
move to a paid model at the beginning of 2011.

At NYTimes.com, users will have free access to a
certain number of articles per month, after which they would be charged
under what the company called a “metered” approach.

Subscribers to the newspaper’s print edition will continue to have free access to the Web version.

The New York Times has a very unique content portfolio and a very loyal readership base,” said Mike Simonton,
credit analyst at Fitch Ratings, in an interview. “So this isn’t a
surprise. But we don’t expect many other newspapers to successfully
follow in its footsteps. They may try.”

The Financial Times has a metered model at FT.com, and The Wall Street Journal, via WSJ.com, has had a Web-based pay model for many years.

Simonton said Washington Post Co., with its heavy emphasis on political content, might be able to make a pay wall work for its namesake WashingtonPost.com.

At Cox Newspapers, which includes the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the Dayton (Ohio) Daily News and other dailies, there are no plans to move any of its sites to a metered model right now, said Leon Levitt, vice president of strategy at Cox Digital Media. However, he said, things will have to change.

“This is not about (a pay wall). At the end of the
day, there aren’t enough people that can be associated with paying for
digital content,” Levitt said. “But there has to be a different model.
There has to be a model that values the expense associated with
gathering content. I applaud the New York Times for being aggressive. Whether that’s the model that works, I don’t know.

“But I think we have to find ways to drive
subscriber revenue across whatever platform readers are consuming the
information. … It might be print, online, e-readers or any way people
might want to get it,” Levitt said.

The Times has taken a big step toward beginning to fix the Web’s information culture, said Tim Harris,
chief executive of Questia, a digital library that contains the world’s
largest online collection of books and journal articles.

“In the short run, it could be viewed as risky,
because there’s this perception out in the world that anything provided
digitally, for some reason, should be free,” Harris said. “But the only
risk here is the time it takes to change perception. The biggest risk
here is not doing anything.”

Harris said that eventually the entire newspaper
industry will be able to adopt a pay model, whether it takes the form
of metering or employs another method, but it will take a core of
powerful brands like the New York Times to lead the charge.

“Once that transition begins, and that perception
begins to change, that provides the impetus for other content providers
to do the same, and that’s what I think you’re going to see,” he said.

One of the main arguments against charging for
online content is that Web traffic to a site may decrease dramatically,
thereby eliminating much of its value to advertisers.

However, said Simonton, the metered structure puts a
premium on readers who are more likely to visit NYTimes.com anyway,
while more casual readers will still get to see articles for free.

“There’s more willingness on the part of the user to
pay, because they’re obviously dedicated to the content. So we wouldn’t
expect the metered approach to minimize the user base significantly,”
he said.

The pay barrier shouldn’t hurt NYTimes.com’s ad rates, said Matt Wise, chief executive of Q Interactive, a Chicago-based
ad network that specializes in predictive-behavioral targeting. “I
don’t think it’ll give them a premium, though, either. Whether people
coming to the site pay or not isn’t a determinant of what kind of
consumers they are, unless the New York Times can show that they have a higher income or are more desirable in some fashion.”

The company said the move will allow it to “keep an
appropriate ratio between free and paid content,” while at the same
time its articles would remain searchable at Google and other search engines.

In a statement, New York Times Co. Chairman Arthur Sulzberger said the newspaper’s audiences “are very loyal” and will be willing to
pay for its “award-winning digital content and services.”

In a broadly lower market, the stock was down 4 percent at $13.15 in afternoon trading.

Last year, New York Times Co. CEO Janet Robinson said the newspaper was considering various ways to charge for online
content. It has previously tried pay models on the Web — most recently
in 2005 when it charged for digital access to its columnists on a tier
called TimesSelect. Discontinued in September 2007, TimesSelect generated about $10 million in revenue per year.

Wednesday’s announcement comes at a time when other newspaper companies are seriously considering paid models online.

Rupert Murdoch, chairman of News Corp.,
reiterated in October his plan to institute charges in some form on all
of the company’s online news sites. He has insisted for several months
that newspapers can no longer give away Web-based content while print
readership continues to decline.

News Corp. is the parent company of Dow Jones & Co., which includes The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones Newswires, Barron’s, Factiva and MarketWatch, the publisher of this report.

During the 2005-07 period, the newspaper industry
had hopes that online advertising could grow enough to ultimately
offset losses in print revenue, but, as a recession deepened into a
historic downturn in 2008, online ad sales began to slide.

New York Times Co., like
other major newspaper publishers, has been cautiously optimistic about
improving ad revenues since the summer of 2009, but results are still
dismal.

In December, New York Times
said it expected fourth-quarter advertising revenue companywide to drop
25 percent compared with the same period in 2008. Online ad revenue was
projected to rise 10 percent, after plunging 14 percent as recently as
the second quarter.

(c) 2010, MarketWatch.com Inc.

Visit MarketWatch on the Web at http://www.marketwatch.com

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Previous articleNBC, O’Brien negotiations hit a snag
Next articleNBC and Conan O’Brien finalize settlement