As divestment from fossil fuels grows, why environmentalists should do more

A coal power plant
Photo courtesy of

Divestment, recently endorsed by active environmentalists like Bill McKibben, has been one of the most popular eco-friendly ideas of recent times. The term refers to removing investments in fossil fuels, oil exploration and other businesses that take advantage of the environment or create pollution.

It’s a powerful idea, writes Dan Apfel for The Nation, but it’s not enough. Stopping investing is a good first step, but those investments need to go to the right places to continue to make progress.

Apfel says a recent report from the World Economic Forum indicate that renewable energy and other climate solutions need heavy investment. And, he says, investing in green industries should go hand-in-hand with divesting from polluting ones.

See the story at The Nation.

Previous articleWhy Jeb Bush’s ‘immigrants are more fertile’ is so puzzling
Next articleIn wake of leak, tech companies race to appear transparent